Muse Spark 1.2 vs Qwen3.7-Max-Preview

  • Muse Spark 1.2 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1482 against 1475.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $1.25 / $4.25 per million input / output tokens, against $1.48 / $4.42 for Qwen3.7-Max-Preview.
  • On the 6 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Muse Spark 1.2 wins 5 and Qwen3.7-Max-Preview wins 1 (Muse Spark 1.2: SWE-bench, Vibe Code Bench, Tax Agent Bench).
LMArena text rating over time
14601470148014901500May 26Jun 26Aug 26Sep 26Oct 26
LatestMuse Spark 1.2 1482Qwen3.7-Max-Preview 1475

Side by side

Models (2/6)
  • Muse Spark 1.2
  • Qwen3.7-Max-Preview
BenchmarkMuse Spark 1.2Qwen3.7-Max-Preview
The model
LabMetaAlibaba
Released2026-08-052026-05-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Input, per 1M tokens$1.25$1.48
Output, per 1M tokens$4.25$4.42
LMArena, people’s votes
LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer1482#17 of 3511475#24 of 351
LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one1533#52 of 1241515#58 of 124
LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image1304#17 of 146—
LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code1505#18 of 3461497#29 of 346
LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts1483#31 of 3391488#23 of 339
LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing1435#56 of 3491448#35 of 349
LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts1490#20 of 3511482#35 of 351
LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow1463#39 of 3511460#40 of 351
Vals AI, coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0Frontier-difficulty tasks an agent completes in a real terminal6.06%#46 of 55—
SWE-benchReal GitHub issues from open-source projects86.60%#14 of 8568.80%#66 of 85
Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works79.10%#27 of 11547.67%#63 of 115
LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive programming problems, collected after models’ training cut-offs to avoid contamination—87.06%#19 of 143
Vals AI, finance
Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions32.80%#17 of 7615.83%#54 of 76
Vals AI, law
Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research43.75%#22 of 8525.48%#59 of 85
Vals AI, medicine
MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes49.35%#24 of 10738.75%#70 of 107
Vals AI, reasoning
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, physics and chemistry that experts answer well and search does not—90.15%#25 of 138
MMLU-ProHarder, reasoning-focused multiple choice across 14 subjects, from law to engineering88.28%#20 of 13889.31%#12 of 138
MMMUCollege-level questions that need both an image and text86.13%#22 of 93—

Add models in the compare tool.

Questions

Which is better, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3.7-Max-Preview?

Muse Spark 1.2 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1482 against 1475. Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $1.25 / $4.25 per million input / output tokens, against $1.48 / $4.42 for Qwen3.7-Max-Preview. On the 6 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Muse Spark 1.2 wins 5 and Qwen3.7-Max-Preview wins 1 (Muse Spark 1.2: SWE-bench, Vibe Code Bench, Tax Agent Bench).

Which is cheaper, Muse Spark 1.2 or Qwen3.7-Max-Preview?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $1.25 / $4.25 per million input / output tokens, against $1.48 / $4.42 for Qwen3.7-Max-Preview.

Sources

Every number on this page comes from these sources; models without a published number show none. Download the data. Cite as “Nexus Explorer, nexus.inc/models”.