MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Spark 1.3

  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 are level on LMArena’s text leaderboard (1491 and 1491).
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.43 / $0.87 per million input / output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.3.
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the longer context window: 1.1M tokens against 1M.
  • On the 5 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 3 and Muse Spark 1.3 wins 2 (MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Terminal-Bench 4.0, Vibe Code Bench, Legal Research Bench).
LMArena text rating over time
14801485149014951500Sep 25Oct 1Oct 8Oct 15Oct 22
LatestMiMo-V2.6-Pro 1491

Side by side

Models (2/6)
  • MiMo-V2.6-Pro
  • Muse Spark 1.3
BenchmarkMiMo-V2.6-ProMuse Spark 1.3
The model
LabXiaomiMeta
Released2026-09-212026-09-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window1.1M1M
Input, per 1M tokens$0.43$1.25
Output, per 1M tokens$0.87$4.25
LMArena, people’s votes
LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer1491#11 of 3511491#10 of 351
LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one1625#23 of 1241657#16 of 124
LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image1263#53 of 1461308#12 of 146
LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code1533#5 of 3461511#13 of 346
LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts1500#16 of 3391502#13 of 339
LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing1466#20 of 3491462#23 of 349
LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts1511#8 of 3511504#13 of 351
LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow1491#12 of 3511479#21 of 351
Vals AI, overall
Vals IndexVals AI’s headline score57.81%#14 of 27—
Vals AI, coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0Frontier-difficulty tasks an agent completes in a real terminal31.31%#21 of 5510.61%#41 of 55
Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works85.22%#15 of 11582.86%#21 of 115
Code MigrationRewriting working programs in a new language, graded on whether the new program still passes its tests48.79%#16 of 28—
Vals AI, finance
Finance AgentThe core tasks of a financial analyst, done as an agent with research tools64.26%#10 of 31—
Finance IndexVals AI’s composite of finance tasks57.85%#12 of 31—
Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions32.39%#19 of 7635.97%#13 of 76
Vals AI, law
Legal IndexVals AI’s composite of legal tasks72.14%#8 of 28—
Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research47.12%#15 of 8540.87%#29 of 85
Vals AI, medicine
MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes44.97%#39 of 107—
Vals AI, reasoning
Terminal-Bench ScienceExpert-written scientific research workflows, run by an agent in a terminal2.86%#33 of 424.29%#25 of 42

Add models in the compare tool.

Questions

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Spark 1.3 are level on LMArena’s text leaderboard (1491 and 1491). MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.43 / $0.87 per million input / output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.3. MiMo-V2.6-Pro has the longer context window: 1.1M tokens against 1M. On the 5 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 3 and Muse Spark 1.3 wins 2 (MiMo-V2.6-Pro: Terminal-Bench 4.0, Vibe Code Bench, Legal Research Bench).

Which is cheaper, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Muse Spark 1.3?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is cheaper: $0.43 / $0.87 per million input / output tokens, against $1.25 / $4.25 for Muse Spark 1.3.

Sources

Every number on this page comes from these sources; models without a published number show none. Download the data. Cite as “Nexus Explorer, nexus.inc/models”.