Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.8-Max

  • Gemini 4 Argon rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1526 against 1484.
  • Qwen3.8-Max is cheaper: $2 / $6 per million input / output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Gemini 4 Argon.
  • On the 11 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Gemini 4 Argon wins 11 and Qwen3.8-Max wins 0.
LMArena text rating over time
14701480149015001510Aug 2Aug 22Sep 11Oct 1Oct 22
LatestQwen3.8-Max 1484

Side by side

Models (2/6)
  • Gemini 4 Argon
  • Qwen3.8-Max
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonQwen3.8-Max
The model
LabGoogleAlibaba
Released2026-10-132026-09-03
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Input, per 1M tokens$2$2
Output, per 1M tokens$10$6
LMArena, people’s votes
LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer1526#1 of 3511484#15 of 351
LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one1674#11 of 1241673#12 of 124
LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image—1313#10 of 146
LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code1539#2 of 3461503#21 of 346
LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts1538#1 of 3391501#15 of 339
LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing1523#2 of 3491477#16 of 349
LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts1538#1 of 3511497#16 of 351
LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow1528#2 of 3511481#18 of 351
Vals AI, overall
Vals IndexVals AI’s headline score69.24%#3 of 2759.05%#11 of 27
Vals AI, coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0Frontier-difficulty tasks an agent completes in a real terminal57.58%#7 of 5534.34%#18 of 55
SWE-benchReal GitHub issues from open-source projects—85.60%#16 of 85
Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works91.91%#2 of 11564.70%#49 of 115
Code MigrationRewriting working programs in a new language, graded on whether the new program still passes its tests70.80%#6 of 2857.19%#10 of 28
LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive programming problems, collected after models’ training cut-offs to avoid contamination—87.85%#10 of 143
Vals AI, finance
Finance AgentThe core tasks of a financial analyst, done as an agent with research tools67.66%#2 of 3158.83%#23 of 31
Finance IndexVals AI’s composite of finance tasks64.89%#2 of 3161.66%#5 of 31
Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions44.56%#5 of 7632.09%#22 of 76
Vals AI, law
Legal IndexVals AI’s composite of legal tasks76.72%#2 of 2873.90%#5 of 28
Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research54.81%#4 of 8546.15%#17 of 85
Vals AI, medicine
MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes58.80%#3 of 10740.67%#62 of 107
Vals AI, reasoning
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, physics and chemistry that experts answer well and search does not—93.69%#6 of 138
MMLU-ProHarder, reasoning-focused multiple choice across 14 subjects, from law to engineering—88.60%#18 of 138
MMMUCollege-level questions that need both an image and text—88.03%#12 of 93
Terminal-Bench ScienceExpert-written scientific research workflows, run by an agent in a terminal44.29%#5 of 4212.86%#13 of 42

Add models in the compare tool. Vals Index: Gemini 4 Argon 69.24%, Qwen3.8-Max 59.05%.

Questions

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.8-Max?

Gemini 4 Argon rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1526 against 1484. Qwen3.8-Max is cheaper: $2 / $6 per million input / output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Gemini 4 Argon. On the 11 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Gemini 4 Argon wins 11 and Qwen3.8-Max wins 0.

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.8-Max?

Qwen3.8-Max is cheaper: $2 / $6 per million input / output tokens, against $2 / $10 for Gemini 4 Argon.

Sources

Every number on this page comes from these sources; models without a published number show none. Download the data. Cite as “Nexus Explorer, nexus.inc/models”.