Gemini 4 Argon vs Claude Opus 5.5

  • Gemini 4 Argon rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1526 against 1516.
  • Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper: $2 / $10 per million input / output tokens, against $4 / $20 for Claude Opus 5.5.
  • On the 11 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Gemini 4 Argon wins 4 and Claude Opus 5.5 wins 7 (Gemini 4 Argon: Vibe Code Bench, Legal Index, Legal Research Bench).

Side by side

Models (2/6)
  • Gemini 4 Argon
  • Claude Opus 5.5
BenchmarkGemini 4 ArgonClaude Opus 5.5
The model
LabGoogleAnthropic
Released2026-10-132026-09-22
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Input, per 1M tokens$2$4
Output, per 1M tokens$10$20
LMArena, people’s votes
LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer1526#1 of 3511516#2 of 351
LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one1674#11 of 1241807#1 of 124
LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image—1321#2 of 146
LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code1539#2 of 3461545#1 of 346
LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts1538#1 of 3391518#6 of 339
LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing1523#2 of 3491534#1 of 349
LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts1538#1 of 3511536#2 of 351
LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow1528#2 of 3511539#1 of 351
Vals AI, overall
Vals IndexVals AI’s headline score69.24%#3 of 2770.18%#2 of 27
Vals AI, coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0Frontier-difficulty tasks an agent completes in a real terminal57.58%#7 of 5565.15%#1 of 55
Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works91.91%#2 of 11590.29%#5 of 115
Code MigrationRewriting working programs in a new language, graded on whether the new program still passes its tests70.80%#6 of 2881.01%#2 of 28
Vals AI, finance
Finance AgentThe core tasks of a financial analyst, done as an agent with research tools67.66%#2 of 3167.85%#1 of 31
Finance IndexVals AI’s composite of finance tasks64.89%#2 of 3165.59%#1 of 31
Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions44.56%#5 of 7645.57%#3 of 76
Vals AI, law
Legal IndexVals AI’s composite of legal tasks76.72%#2 of 2872.33%#7 of 28
Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research54.81%#4 of 8550.48%#7 of 85
Vals AI, medicine
MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes58.80%#3 of 10749.80%#19 of 107
Vals AI, reasoning
Terminal-Bench ScienceExpert-written scientific research workflows, run by an agent in a terminal44.29%#5 of 4247.14%#3 of 42

Add models in the compare tool. Vals Index: Gemini 4 Argon 69.24%, Claude Opus 5.5 70.18%.

Questions

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Claude Opus 5.5?

Gemini 4 Argon rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1526 against 1516. Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper: $2 / $10 per million input / output tokens, against $4 / $20 for Claude Opus 5.5. On the 11 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Gemini 4 Argon wins 4 and Claude Opus 5.5 wins 7 (Gemini 4 Argon: Vibe Code Bench, Legal Index, Legal Research Bench).

Which is cheaper, Gemini 4 Argon or Claude Opus 5.5?

Gemini 4 Argon is cheaper: $2 / $10 per million input / output tokens, against $4 / $20 for Claude Opus 5.5.

Sources

Every number on this page comes from these sources; models without a published number show none. Download the data. Cite as “Nexus Explorer, nexus.inc/models”.