Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Opus 5

  • Claude Opus 5.5 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1516 against 1508.
  • Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper: $4 / $20 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 5.
  • On the 6 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 5.5 wins 4 and Claude Opus 5 wins 2 (Claude Opus 5.5: Terminal-Bench 4.0, Vibe Code Bench, Tax Agent Bench).

Side by side

Models (2/6)
  • Claude Opus 5.5
  • Claude Opus 5
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Claude Opus 5
The model
LabAnthropicAnthropic
Released2026-09-222026-07-24
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Input, per 1M tokens$4$5
Output, per 1M tokens$20$25
LMArena, people’s votes
LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer1516#2 of 3511508#4 of 351
LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one1807#1 of 1241691#9 of 124
LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image1321#2 of 1461320#3 of 146
LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code1545#1 of 3461533#4 of 346
LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts1518#6 of 3391533#2 of 339
LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing1534#1 of 3491495#5 of 349
LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts1536#2 of 3511527#4 of 351
LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow1539#1 of 3511518#5 of 351
Vals AI, overall
Vals IndexVals AI’s headline score70.18%#2 of 27—
Vals AI, coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0Frontier-difficulty tasks an agent completes in a real terminal65.15%#1 of 5553.53%#9 of 55
SWE-benchReal GitHub issues from open-source projects—97.00%#1 of 85
Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works90.29%#5 of 11588.40%#9 of 115
Code MigrationRewriting working programs in a new language, graded on whether the new program still passes its tests81.01%#2 of 28—
LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive programming problems, collected after models’ training cut-offs to avoid contamination—89.03%#4 of 143
Vals AI, finance
Finance AgentThe core tasks of a financial analyst, done as an agent with research tools67.85%#1 of 31—
Finance IndexVals AI’s composite of finance tasks65.59%#1 of 31—
Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions45.57%#3 of 7645.55%#4 of 76
Vals AI, law
Legal IndexVals AI’s composite of legal tasks72.33%#7 of 28—
Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research50.48%#7 of 8555.29%#2 of 85
Vals AI, medicine
MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes49.80%#19 of 10763.57%#1 of 107
Vals AI, reasoning
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, physics and chemistry that experts answer well and search does not—93.43%#8 of 138
MMLU-ProHarder, reasoning-focused multiple choice across 14 subjects, from law to engineering—91.59%#2 of 138
MMMUCollege-level questions that need both an image and text—89.88%#2 of 93
Terminal-Bench ScienceExpert-written scientific research workflows, run by an agent in a terminal47.14%#3 of 4227.14%#9 of 42

Add models in the compare tool.

Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or Claude Opus 5?

Claude Opus 5.5 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1516 against 1508. Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper: $4 / $20 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 5. On the 6 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 5.5 wins 4 and Claude Opus 5 wins 2 (Claude Opus 5.5: Terminal-Bench 4.0, Vibe Code Bench, Tax Agent Bench).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Claude Opus 5?

Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper: $4 / $20 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 5.

Sources

Every number on this page comes from these sources; models without a published number show none. Download the data. Cite as “Nexus Explorer, nexus.inc/models”.