Claude Opus 5.5 vs Claude Fable 5.1

  • Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 are level on LMArena’s text leaderboard (1516 and 1513).
  • Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper: $4 / $20 per million input / output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.1.
  • On the 6 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 5.5 wins 3 and Claude Fable 5.1 wins 3 (Claude Opus 5.5: Terminal-Bench 4.0, Vibe Code Bench, Terminal-Bench Science).

Side by side

Models (2/6)
  • Claude Opus 5.5
  • Claude Fable 5.1
BenchmarkClaude Opus 5.5Claude Fable 5.1
The model
LabAnthropicAnthropic
Released2026-09-222026-09-01
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Input, per 1M tokens$4$10
Output, per 1M tokens$20$50
LMArena, people’s votes
LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer1516#2 of 3511513#3 of 351
LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one1807#1 of 1241743#5 of 124
LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image1321#2 of 1461320#4 of 146
LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code1545#1 of 3461531#7 of 346
LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts1518#6 of 3391532#3 of 339
LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing1534#1 of 3491510#3 of 349
LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts1536#2 of 3511528#3 of 351
LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow1539#1 of 3511519#4 of 351
Vals AI, overall
Vals IndexVals AI’s headline score70.18%#2 of 27—
Vals AI, coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0Frontier-difficulty tasks an agent completes in a real terminal65.15%#1 of 5558.08%#5 of 55
Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works90.29%#5 of 11590.26%#6 of 115
Code MigrationRewriting working programs in a new language, graded on whether the new program still passes its tests81.01%#2 of 28—
LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive programming problems, collected after models’ training cut-offs to avoid contamination—90.52%#1 of 143
Vals AI, finance
Finance AgentThe core tasks of a financial analyst, done as an agent with research tools67.85%#1 of 31—
Finance IndexVals AI’s composite of finance tasks65.59%#1 of 31—
Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions45.57%#3 of 7649.19%#2 of 76
Vals AI, law
Legal IndexVals AI’s composite of legal tasks72.33%#7 of 28—
Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research50.48%#7 of 8555.29%#3 of 85
Vals AI, medicine
MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes49.80%#19 of 10753.51%#8 of 107
Vals AI, reasoning
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, physics and chemistry that experts answer well and search does not—93.43%#9 of 138
MMLU-ProHarder, reasoning-focused multiple choice across 14 subjects, from law to engineering—92.38%#1 of 138
MMMUCollege-level questions that need both an image and text—90.64%#1 of 93
Terminal-Bench ScienceExpert-written scientific research workflows, run by an agent in a terminal47.14%#3 of 4240.00%#6 of 42

Add models in the compare tool.

Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or Claude Fable 5.1?

Claude Opus 5.5 and Claude Fable 5.1 are level on LMArena’s text leaderboard (1516 and 1513). Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper: $4 / $20 per million input / output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.1. On the 6 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 5.5 wins 3 and Claude Fable 5.1 wins 3 (Claude Opus 5.5: Terminal-Bench 4.0, Vibe Code Bench, Terminal-Bench Science).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 5.5 or Claude Fable 5.1?

Claude Opus 5.5 is cheaper: $4 / $20 per million input / output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.1.

Sources

Every number on this page comes from these sources; models without a published number show none. Download the data. Cite as “Nexus Explorer, nexus.inc/models”.