Gemini 4 Argon
Claude Opus 5.5
Muse Wonder
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Qwen3.8-Max
Kimi K3
GLM-5.3
GPT-5.5
ERNIE 5.1
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910
Grok 4.20 Beta
amazon-nova-experimental-chat
Dola Seed 2.0 Pro
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B
Gemma 4 31B
Step 5 PreviewClaude Opus 4.7 vs Qwen3.7-Max-Preview
- Claude Opus 4.7 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1490 against 1475.
- Qwen3.7-Max-Preview is cheaper: $1.48 / $4.42 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7.
- On the 8 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 6 and Qwen3.7-Max-Preview wins 2 (Claude Opus 4.7: SWE-bench, Vibe Code Bench, Tax Agent Bench).
LatestClaude Opus 4.7 1490Qwen3.7-Max-Preview 1475
Side by side
Models (2/6)
- Claude Opus 4.7
- Qwen3.7-Max-Preview
| Benchmark | Claude Opus 4.7 | Qwen3.7-Max-Preview |
|---|---|---|
| The model | ||
| Lab | Anthropic | Alibaba |
| Released | 2026-04-16 | 2026-05-21 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input, per 1M tokens | $5 | $1.48 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $25 | $4.42 |
| LMArena, people’s votes | ||
| LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer | 1490#13 of 351 | 1475#24 of 351 |
| LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one | 1558#41 of 124 | 1515#58 of 124 |
| LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image | 1317#5 of 146 | — |
| LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code | 1518#9 of 346 | 1497#29 of 346 |
| LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts | 1498#17 of 339 | 1488#23 of 339 |
| LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing | 1486#11 of 349 | 1448#35 of 349 |
| LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts | 1506#11 of 351 | 1482#35 of 351 |
| LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow | 1498#9 of 351 | 1460#40 of 351 |
| Vals AI, coding | ||
| SWE-benchReal GitHub issues from open-source projects | 82.00%#21 of 85 | 68.80%#66 of 85 |
| Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works | 71.00%#41 of 115 | 47.67%#63 of 115 |
| LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive programming problems, collected after models’ training cut-offs to avoid contamination | 85.07%#36 of 143 | 87.06%#19 of 143 |
| Vals AI, finance | ||
| Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions | 23.74%#43 of 76 | 15.83%#54 of 76 |
| Vals AI, law | ||
| Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research | 38.46%#35 of 85 | 25.48%#59 of 85 |
| Vals AI, medicine | ||
| MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes | 54.86%#7 of 107 | 38.75%#70 of 107 |
| Vals AI, reasoning | ||
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, physics and chemistry that experts answer well and search does not | 90.15%#26 of 138 | 90.15%#25 of 138 |
| MMLU-ProHarder, reasoning-focused multiple choice across 14 subjects, from law to engineering | 89.87%#8 of 138 | 89.31%#12 of 138 |
| AIMEProblems from the American Invitational Mathematics Examination, a qualifier for the US Math Olympiad | 96.25%#7 of 96 | — |
| MMMUCollege-level questions that need both an image and text | 85.55%#24 of 93 | — |
Add models in the compare tool.
Questions
Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.7-Max-Preview?
Claude Opus 4.7 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1490 against 1475. Qwen3.7-Max-Preview is cheaper: $1.48 / $4.42 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7. On the 8 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 6 and Qwen3.7-Max-Preview wins 2 (Claude Opus 4.7: SWE-bench, Vibe Code Bench, Tax Agent Bench).
Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Qwen3.7-Max-Preview?
Qwen3.7-Max-Preview is cheaper: $1.48 / $4.42 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7.