Claude Opus 4.7 vs Muse Spark 1.2

  • Claude Opus 4.7 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1490 against 1482.
  • Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $1.25 / $4.25 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7.
  • On the 7 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 2 and Muse Spark 1.2 wins 5 (Claude Opus 4.7: MedCode, MMLU-Pro).
LMArena text rating over time
14601470148014901500Apr 26Jun 26Jul 26Sep 26Oct 26
LatestClaude Opus 4.7 1490Muse Spark 1.2 1482

Side by side

Models (2/6)
  • Claude Opus 4.7
  • Muse Spark 1.2
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Muse Spark 1.2
The model
LabAnthropicMeta
Released2026-04-162026-08-05
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Input, per 1M tokens$5$1.25
Output, per 1M tokens$25$4.25
LMArena, people’s votes
LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer1490#13 of 3511482#17 of 351
LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one1558#41 of 1241533#52 of 124
LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image1317#5 of 1461304#17 of 146
LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code1518#9 of 3461505#18 of 346
LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts1498#17 of 3391483#31 of 339
LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing1486#11 of 3491435#56 of 349
LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts1506#11 of 3511490#20 of 351
LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow1498#9 of 3511463#39 of 351
Vals AI, coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0Frontier-difficulty tasks an agent completes in a real terminal—6.06%#46 of 55
SWE-benchReal GitHub issues from open-source projects82.00%#21 of 8586.60%#14 of 85
Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works71.00%#41 of 11579.10%#27 of 115
LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive programming problems, collected after models’ training cut-offs to avoid contamination85.07%#36 of 143—
Vals AI, finance
Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions23.74%#43 of 7632.80%#17 of 76
Vals AI, law
Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research38.46%#35 of 8543.75%#22 of 85
Vals AI, medicine
MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes54.86%#7 of 10749.35%#24 of 107
Vals AI, reasoning
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, physics and chemistry that experts answer well and search does not90.15%#26 of 138—
MMLU-ProHarder, reasoning-focused multiple choice across 14 subjects, from law to engineering89.87%#8 of 13888.28%#20 of 138
AIMEProblems from the American Invitational Mathematics Examination, a qualifier for the US Math Olympiad96.25%#7 of 96—
MMMUCollege-level questions that need both an image and text85.55%#24 of 9386.13%#22 of 93

Add models in the compare tool.

Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Muse Spark 1.2?

Claude Opus 4.7 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1490 against 1482. Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $1.25 / $4.25 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7. On the 7 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 2 and Muse Spark 1.2 wins 5 (Claude Opus 4.7: MedCode, MMLU-Pro).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Muse Spark 1.2?

Muse Spark 1.2 is cheaper: $1.25 / $4.25 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7.

Sources

Every number on this page comes from these sources; models without a published number show none. Download the data. Cite as “Nexus Explorer, nexus.inc/models”.