Claude Opus 4.7 vs Gemini 3.6 Flash

  • Claude Opus 4.7 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1490 against 1480.
  • Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper: $0.75 / $3.75 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7.
  • On the 9 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 6 and Gemini 3.6 Flash wins 3 (Claude Opus 4.7: SWE-bench, Vibe Code Bench, Tax Agent Bench).
LMArena text rating over time
14601470148014901500Apr 26Jun 26Jul 26Sep 26Oct 26
LatestClaude Opus 4.7 1490Gemini 3.6 Flash 1480

Side by side

Models (2/6)
  • Claude Opus 4.7
  • Gemini 3.6 Flash
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.7Gemini 3.6 Flash
The model
LabAnthropicGoogle
Released2026-04-162026-07-21
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Input, per 1M tokens$5$0.75
Output, per 1M tokens$25$3.75
LMArena, people’s votes
LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer1490#13 of 3511480#20 of 351
LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one1558#41 of 1241538#49 of 124
LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image1317#5 of 1461299#20 of 146
LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code1518#9 of 3461491#34 of 346
LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts1498#17 of 3391507#11 of 339
LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing1486#11 of 3491466#21 of 349
LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts1506#11 of 3511486#25 of 351
LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow1498#9 of 3511467#31 of 351
Vals AI, coding
SWE-benchReal GitHub issues from open-source projects82.00%#21 of 8579.60%#25 of 85
Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works71.00%#41 of 11564.00%#50 of 115
LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive programming problems, collected after models’ training cut-offs to avoid contamination85.07%#36 of 14388.08%#8 of 143
Vals AI, finance
Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions23.74%#43 of 7618.04%#53 of 76
Vals AI, law
Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research38.46%#35 of 8525.00%#60 of 85
Vals AI, medicine
MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes54.86%#7 of 10753.15%#11 of 107
Vals AI, reasoning
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, physics and chemistry that experts answer well and search does not90.15%#26 of 13893.43%#7 of 138
MMLU-ProHarder, reasoning-focused multiple choice across 14 subjects, from law to engineering89.87%#8 of 13889.28%#13 of 138
AIMEProblems from the American Invitational Mathematics Examination, a qualifier for the US Math Olympiad96.25%#7 of 96—
MMMUCollege-level questions that need both an image and text85.55%#24 of 9388.38%#7 of 93
Terminal-Bench ScienceExpert-written scientific research workflows, run by an agent in a terminal—4.29%#28 of 42

Add models in the compare tool.

Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Claude Opus 4.7 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1490 against 1480. Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper: $0.75 / $3.75 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7. On the 9 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 4.7 wins 6 and Gemini 3.6 Flash wins 3 (Claude Opus 4.7: SWE-bench, Vibe Code Bench, Tax Agent Bench).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.7 or Gemini 3.6 Flash?

Gemini 3.6 Flash is cheaper: $0.75 / $3.75 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.7.

Sources

Every number on this page comes from these sources; models without a published number show none. Download the data. Cite as “Nexus Explorer, nexus.inc/models”.