Claude Opus 4.6 vs Kimi K3

  • Claude Opus 4.6 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1502 against 1475.
  • Kimi K3 is cheaper: $0.24 / $11 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.6.
  • On the 7 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 and Kimi K3 wins 6 (Claude Opus 4.6: MMLU-Pro).
LMArena text rating over time
14601475149015051520Feb 26Apr 26Jun 26Aug 26Oct 26
LatestClaude Opus 4.6 1502Kimi K3 1475

Side by side

Models (2/6)
  • Claude Opus 4.6
  • Kimi K3
BenchmarkClaude Opus 4.6Kimi K3
The model
LabAnthropicMoonshot AI
Released2026-02-042026-07-16
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window1M1M
Input, per 1M tokens$5$0.24
Output, per 1M tokens$25$10.80
LMArena, people’s votes
LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer1502#6 of 3511475#25 of 351
LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one1546#45 of 1241655#17 of 124
LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image1316#6 of 146—
LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code1534#3 of 3461508#16 of 346
LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts1518#7 of 3391493#20 of 339
LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing1505#4 of 3491456#28 of 349
LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts1524#5 of 3511495#17 of 351
LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow1521#3 of 3511485#16 of 351
Vals AI, overall
Vals IndexVals AI’s headline score—52.95%#20 of 27
Vals AI, coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0Frontier-difficulty tasks an agent completes in a real terminal—17.17%#34 of 55
SWE-benchReal GitHub issues from open-source projects78.20%#30 of 8593.40%#8 of 85
Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works53.50%#57 of 11584.97%#16 of 115
Code MigrationRewriting working programs in a new language, graded on whether the new program still passes its tests—28.59%#23 of 28
LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive programming problems, collected after models’ training cut-offs to avoid contamination84.68%#38 of 14387.19%#18 of 143
Vals AI, finance
Finance AgentThe core tasks of a financial analyst, done as an agent with research tools—60.01%#21 of 31
Finance IndexVals AI’s composite of finance tasks—57.95%#11 of 31
Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions—33.37%#15 of 76
Vals AI, law
Legal IndexVals AI’s composite of legal tasks—71.72%#10 of 28
Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research—46.15%#16 of 85
Vals AI, medicine
MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes48.24%#30 of 10749.36%#23 of 107
MedQAMedical licensing exam questions, measured on accuracy and on robustness to bias95.41%#12 of 92—
Vals AI, reasoning
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, physics and chemistry that experts answer well and search does not89.65%#29 of 13892.93%#12 of 138
MMLU-ProHarder, reasoning-focused multiple choice across 14 subjects, from law to engineering89.11%#15 of 13887.97%#22 of 138
AIMEProblems from the American Invitational Mathematics Examination, a qualifier for the US Math Olympiad95.63%#9 of 96—
MMMUCollege-level questions that need both an image and text83.87%#29 of 9388.15%#11 of 93
Terminal-Bench ScienceExpert-written scientific research workflows, run by an agent in a terminal—1.43%#38 of 42

Add models in the compare tool.

Questions

Which is better, Claude Opus 4.6 or Kimi K3?

Claude Opus 4.6 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1502 against 1475. Kimi K3 is cheaper: $0.24 / $11 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.6. On the 7 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Opus 4.6 wins 1 and Kimi K3 wins 6 (Claude Opus 4.6: MMLU-Pro).

Which is cheaper, Claude Opus 4.6 or Kimi K3?

Kimi K3 is cheaper: $0.24 / $11 per million input / output tokens, against $5 / $25 for Claude Opus 4.6.

Sources

Every number on this page comes from these sources; models without a published number show none. Download the data. Cite as “Nexus Explorer, nexus.inc/models”.