Claude Fable 5 vs Gemini 3.7 Flash

  • Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.7 Flash are level on LMArena’s text leaderboard (1491 and 1490).
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.75 / $3.75 per million input / output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.
  • On the 11 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Fable 5 wins 10 and Gemini 3.7 Flash wins 1 (Claude Fable 5: Terminal-Bench 4.0, SWE-bench, Vibe Code Bench).
LMArena text rating over time
14801488149515031510Jun 26Jul 26Aug 26Sep 26Oct 26
LatestClaude Fable 5 1491

Side by side

Models (2/6)
  • Claude Fable 5
  • Gemini 3.7 Flash
BenchmarkClaude Fable 5Gemini 3.7 Flash
The model
LabAnthropicGoogle
Released2026-06-092026-08-13
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window1M1M
Input, per 1M tokens$10$0.75
Output, per 1M tokens$50$3.75
LMArena, people’s votes
LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer1491#12 of 3511490#14 of 351
LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one1624#24 of 1241590#33 of 124
LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image1325#1 of 1461314#8 of 146
LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code1518#10 of 3461501#24 of 346
LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts1516#8 of 3391510#10 of 339
LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing1493#6 of 3491489#9 of 349
LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts1507#10 of 3511497#15 of 351
LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow1502#8 of 3511486#15 of 351
Vals AI, coding
Terminal-Bench 4.0Frontier-difficulty tasks an agent completes in a real terminal41.41%#12 of 5512.12%#37 of 55
SWE-benchReal GitHub issues from open-source projects95.00%#7 of 8580.80%#22 of 85
Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works90.35%#4 of 11570.39%#43 of 115
LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive programming problems, collected after models’ training cut-offs to avoid contamination89.78%#2 of 14388.65%#5 of 143
Vals AI, finance
Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions38.28%#11 of 7622.80%#44 of 76
Vals AI, law
Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research49.52%#8 of 8534.62%#45 of 85
Vals AI, medicine
MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes56.07%#4 of 10753.39%#9 of 107
Vals AI, reasoning
GPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, physics and chemistry that experts answer well and search does not93.18%#10 of 13893.94%#5 of 138
MMLU-ProHarder, reasoning-focused multiple choice across 14 subjects, from law to engineering91.50%#3 of 13890.12%#6 of 138
MMMUCollege-level questions that need both an image and text89.31%#3 of 9388.96%#5 of 93
Terminal-Bench ScienceExpert-written scientific research workflows, run by an agent in a terminal15.71%#12 of 427.14%#20 of 42

Add models in the compare tool.

Questions

Which is better, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Claude Fable 5 and Gemini 3.7 Flash are level on LMArena’s text leaderboard (1491 and 1490). Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.75 / $3.75 per million input / output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5. On the 11 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Fable 5 wins 10 and Gemini 3.7 Flash wins 1 (Claude Fable 5: Terminal-Bench 4.0, SWE-bench, Vibe Code Bench).

Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5 or Gemini 3.7 Flash?

Gemini 3.7 Flash is cheaper: $0.75 / $3.75 per million input / output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.

Sources

Every number on this page comes from these sources; models without a published number show none. Download the data. Cite as “Nexus Explorer, nexus.inc/models”.