Gemini 4 Argon
Claude Opus 5.5
Muse Wonder
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Qwen3.8-Max
Kimi K3
GLM-5.3
GPT-5.5
ERNIE 5.1
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-20260910
Grok 4.20 Beta
amazon-nova-experimental-chat
Dola Seed 2.0 Pro
NVIDIA-Nemotron-3-Ultra-550B-A55B
Gemma 4 31B
Step 5 PreviewClaude Fable 5.1 vs Muse Wonder
- Claude Fable 5.1 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1513 against 1501.
- Muse Wonder is cheaper: $4 / $20 per million input / output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.1.
- On the 5 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Fable 5.1 wins 5 and Muse Wonder wins 0.
Side by side
Models (2/6)
- Claude Fable 5.1
- Muse Wonder
| Benchmark | Claude Fable 5.1 | Muse Wonder |
|---|---|---|
| The model | ||
| Lab | Anthropic | Meta |
| Released | 2026-09-01 | 2026-10-12 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | 1M |
| Input, per 1M tokens | $10 | $4 |
| Output, per 1M tokens | $50 | $20 |
| LMArena, people’s votes | ||
| LMArena TextMillions of people compare two anonymous models side by side and vote for the better answer | 1513#3 of 351 | 1501#7 of 351 |
| LMArena WebDevPeople ask two anonymous models to build the same web app, try both and vote for the better one | 1743#5 of 124 | 1651#18 of 124 |
| LMArena VisionSide-by-side votes on prompts that include an image | 1320#4 of 146 | — |
| LMArena CodingLMArena’s text votes on prompts that ask for code | 1531#7 of 346 | 1518#11 of 346 |
| LMArena MathLMArena’s text votes on math prompts | 1532#3 of 339 | 1484#30 of 339 |
| LMArena Creative writingLMArena’s text votes on stories, poems and other creative writing | 1510#3 of 349 | 1493#7 of 349 |
| LMArena Hard promptsLMArena’s text votes on the hardest prompts | 1528#3 of 351 | 1505#12 of 351 |
| LMArena Instruction followingLMArena’s text votes on prompts with specific instructions to follow | 1519#4 of 351 | 1493#10 of 351 |
| Vals AI, overall | ||
| Vals IndexVals AI’s headline score | — | 64.88%#6 of 27 |
| Vals AI, coding | ||
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Frontier-difficulty tasks an agent completes in a real terminal | 58.08%#5 of 55 | 49.49%#10 of 55 |
| Vibe Code BenchBuilding complete web apps from a plain-language brief, graded on whether the app works | 90.26%#6 of 115 | 83.09%#20 of 115 |
| Code MigrationRewriting working programs in a new language, graded on whether the new program still passes its tests | — | 72.36%#5 of 28 |
| LiveCodeBenchFresh competitive programming problems, collected after models’ training cut-offs to avoid contamination | 90.52%#1 of 143 | — |
| Vals AI, finance | ||
| Finance AgentThe core tasks of a financial analyst, done as an agent with research tools | — | 65.55%#6 of 31 |
| Finance IndexVals AI’s composite of finance tasks | — | 61.23%#6 of 31 |
| Tax Agent BenchAgentic research into US corporate tax questions | 49.19%#2 of 76 | 36.27%#12 of 76 |
| Vals AI, law | ||
| Legal IndexVals AI’s composite of legal tasks | — | 75.26%#3 of 28 |
| Legal Research BenchAgentic US legal research | 55.29%#3 of 85 | 50.48%#6 of 85 |
| Vals AI, medicine | ||
| MedCodeAssigning the right medical billing codes from clinical notes | 53.51%#8 of 107 | — |
| Vals AI, reasoning | ||
| GPQA DiamondGraduate-level questions in biology, physics and chemistry that experts answer well and search does not | 93.43%#9 of 138 | — |
| MMLU-ProHarder, reasoning-focused multiple choice across 14 subjects, from law to engineering | 92.38%#1 of 138 | — |
| MMMUCollege-level questions that need both an image and text | 90.64%#1 of 93 | — |
| Terminal-Bench ScienceExpert-written scientific research workflows, run by an agent in a terminal | 40.00%#6 of 42 | 22.86%#10 of 42 |
Add models in the compare tool.
Questions
Which is better, Claude Fable 5.1 or Muse Wonder?
Claude Fable 5.1 rates higher on LMArena’s text leaderboard: 1513 against 1501. Muse Wonder is cheaper: $4 / $20 per million input / output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.1. On the 5 Vals AI benchmarks both have taken, Claude Fable 5.1 wins 5 and Muse Wonder wins 0.
Which is cheaper, Claude Fable 5.1 or Muse Wonder?
Muse Wonder is cheaper: $4 / $20 per million input / output tokens, against $10 / $50 for Claude Fable 5.1.